• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Finance Train

Finance Train

High Quality tutorials for finance, risk, data science

  • Home
  • Data Science
  • CFA® Exam
  • PRM Exam
  • Tutorials
  • Careers
  • Products
  • Login

FSA Proposed Changes to Reverse Stress Testing

PRM Exam, PRM Exam III

This lesson is part 1 of 2 in the course Stress, and Scenario, Testing

Stress and scenario testing should be an integral part of the tools used by the firm’s

senior management in making integrated business strategy, risk management and capital planning decisions. Recent market events have shown the importance of strong governance in firms. Senior management at less affected firms had more successfully established comprehensive firm-wide risk assessment processes in which thoughtful stress and scenario testing played a material part, allowing better-informed and more timely decision-making. However, reviews of firms’ Pillar 2 individual capital assessments, and broader work on stress and scenario testing arrangements, have indicated that for many firms stress and scenario testing is not as robust, nor as embedded in senior management decision-making, as we would like.

In its consultation paper, Stress and scenario testing, Financial Services Authority (FSA) proposes changes to rules and guidance on stress and scenario testing.

In this article, we summarize one of the proposed changes, namely, the reverse-stress test requirement.

Under this new requirement, a firm is required to explicitly identify and assess the scenarios most likely to cause its current business plan to become unviable. In this context, a firm’s business plan should be assumed unviable at the point that crystallising risks cause the market to lose confidence in it, with the consequence that counterparties and other stakeholders are unwilling to transact with it or provide capital to the firm and, where relevant, that existing counterparties may seek to terminate their contracts. Recent experience suggests that such a point may be reached well before a firm’s regulatory capital is exhausted.

The intention behind the introduction of this new requirement is to encourage firms: first, to explore more fully the vulnerabilities of their current business plan (including ‘tail risks’ as well as milder adverse scenarios); second, to make decisions that better integrate business and capital planning; and third, to improve their contingency planning. In the case of “common platform firms’’ the reverse-stress test requirement elaborates the MiFID-derived requirements on risk control.

The proposed requirement is intended to be holistic, so firms should consider liquidity risks as well as risks to their capital positions.

An underlying objective would be to improve consumer protection and market confidence by ensuring that a firm can survive long enough after risks have crystallised for one of the following to occur:

  • the market decides that its lack of confidence is unfounded and re-commences transacting with the firm;
  • the firm down-sizes and re-structures its business;
  • the firm is taken over, or its business is transferred in an orderly manner; or
  • public authorities take over the firm, or wind down its business in an orderly manner.

As a result, it is our view that adequate stress and scenario testing arrangements at a firm should help both to reduce the probability of its financial failure of a firm and the consequent wider impact and costs of any financial failure by making any wind down or re-structuring orderly.

The process of identifying and analysing adverse scenarios that, if they were to occur, would cause a firm’s business model vulnerabilities to crystallise should include a consideration of the likelihood or remoteness of such risks arising in practice.

The introduction of a reverse-stress test requirement should not be interpreted as indicating that we are now pursuing a ‘zero-failure’ policy.

Previous Lesson

‹

Next Lesson

BIS – Principles for Sound Stress Testing Practices and Supervision ›

Join Our Facebook Group - Finance, Risk and Data Science

Posts You May Like

How to Improve your Financial Health

CFA® Exam Overview and Guidelines (Updated for 2021)

Changing Themes (Look and Feel) in ggplot2 in R

Coordinates in ggplot2 in R

Facets for ggplot2 Charts in R (Faceting Layer)

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

In this Course

  • FSA Proposed Changes to Reverse Stress Testing
  • BIS – Principles for Sound Stress Testing Practices and Supervision

Latest Tutorials

    • Data Visualization with R
    • Derivatives with R
    • Machine Learning in Finance Using Python
    • Credit Risk Modelling in R
    • Quantitative Trading Strategies in R
    • Financial Time Series Analysis in R
    • VaR Mapping
    • Option Valuation
    • Financial Reporting Standards
    • Fraud
Facebook Group

Membership

Unlock full access to Finance Train and see the entire library of member-only content and resources.

Subscribe

Footer

Recent Posts

  • How to Improve your Financial Health
  • CFA® Exam Overview and Guidelines (Updated for 2021)
  • Changing Themes (Look and Feel) in ggplot2 in R
  • Coordinates in ggplot2 in R
  • Facets for ggplot2 Charts in R (Faceting Layer)

Products

  • Level I Authority for CFA® Exam
  • CFA Level I Practice Questions
  • CFA Level I Mock Exam
  • Level II Question Bank for CFA® Exam
  • PRM Exam 1 Practice Question Bank
  • All Products

Quick Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

CFA Institute does not endorse, promote or warrant the accuracy or quality of Finance Train. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Copyright © 2021 Finance Train. All rights reserved.

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us